S.) 471, 476 (1913) try handling here

S.) 471, 476 (1913) try handling here

Appellant, McCaffrey’s, Inc., appetite that matter-of Russell v. Palentine In. , 106 Skip. 290, 301, 63 So. 644, 646, 51 L.Roentgen.A great. (Letter. Under the items in this case we told you:

“Is i hold you to appellee (learn and you will employer) try guilty of the brand new acts regarding Klein (servant and you can worker), it might be to hold, when an authority to gather a debt is found, what the law states commonly suggest the authority to *414 institute unlawful process up against the debtor in case the debtor fails or won’t shell out. We do not believe that this really is voice inside the cause otherwise in-law.”

In the immediate situation, we neither concern this rule from laws just like the revealed because instance beneath the activities therein, nor can we restrict otherwise extend its operation. (more…)

Continue ReadingS.) 471, 476 (1913) try handling here